What Jessie Did Next...

...being the inane ramblings of a mundane Yorkshire bird.

Tag: photography (page 4 of 4)

For a while, Nicky and I were scanning in old pics from as far back as 1979 when I got my first little 120 roll camera (secondhand off Wakefield market, I think I paid 50p for it!). That stopped when we got a bit too busy since it’s quite time consuming and they had to be done on a flatbed scanner. Fast-forward to yesterday when, in a moment of getting away from a particularly evil programming problem I decided to have a play with the minilab’s scanner unit, finding that a strip of four negs takes about 10 seconds to scan and lab dumps the JPEGs in a directory on the fileserver. Hoorah! I can scan the rest of the stuff in!

A couple of advantages to this method:

  • There’s not as much image degradation as when I was flatbed-scanning the prints themselves.
  • I’ve filled in some gaps from around 1990-1994, where an ex-girlfriend had been through my prints and cut out the photos of any other ex-girlfriend (this is bizarre, it’s like getting a chunk of your life back, like discovering old photos left over from communist-era Russia).
  • It’s fast, there’s no messing around cropping stuff, and the frame numbers are preserved within the filename. I did about 600MB of pics in 45 minutes yesterday.

The disadvantage is in trying to remember or work out dates that things happened – I’d quite like the pics to be in chronological order but sometimes that’s almost impossible. I’ll have to dig out my old filofax from home, or see if my Palm has any other data imported from earlier (I kept an electronic diary, and wrote a journal from around 1990 onwards).

The only odd thing I’ve found is in scanning any Ilford FP4 film – for some weird reason it crashes the lab with an error. I have absolutely no idea why it does this, but I’ll bring it up with the lab engineer when he next pops round for a cuppa. Consequently spools such as the BBC Acorn User Show 1991 will have to wait.

I’ll add the pics as and when I have named and dated them.

I’ve just spent the morning in Leeds, after turning up at the Commercial Street shop at 10ish with my not-very-good Canon EOS 30D.

The gentleman remembered me from Sunday, so it was reasonably easy just to get started. He brought out another 30D for me and I went outside to take some photos to test it was all OK – sadly not, there were 3 or 4 obvious marks. So another unit was procured, which had the same problem.

Then they’d run out of 30D bodies, so he walked up to the nearest branch on Headrow and picked up their remaining 30D. That had dust on it.

By that time I was getting a bit anxious, but the nice gentleman phoned the Merrion Centre branch which had a sealed one and a display model. The sealed unit also had dust on the CCD, so we tried the display model. That worked! So now I have a 30D which doesn’t have dust on it.

According to the sales guys I spoke to, they’ve had quite a few 400Ds returned with dirty CCDs which just won’t clean, and the current rumour is there’s a bad batch – this seemed to be the first 30D they’d had back but by their own admission they don’t sell many. Bizarrely, my 10D lasted two years before I needed to get the CCD cleaned, and I’m wondering if the CCD in the 30D is susceptible. It also shows that the 400D’s CCD-cleaning feature doesn’t actually seems to be that great.

Irritating, but I’m glad it’s sorted and Jessops were very helpful in rectifying the problem.

I’d noticed on some of the test shots I did on the 30D, that there were a couple of dark patches. Very faint, but there nontheless and if you know what you’re looking for it’s very distracting – a hallmark of dust on the CCD. This isn’t something you should have on a brand new camera.

Now I’ve had my suspicions that this camera I’d bought from Leeds Jessops had been pre-owned (the seal on the box seemed to be taped back up when I bought it but I paid it little mind – lots of companies do that to check contents before selling), but this seems to confirm it. I’ve barely had 1000 pics off it and all of them have the same dusty bit.

For those of you wondering how I checked – whack the aperture right up (f28 in this case), point it at a blue sky and take a pic. The uniform colour shows the problem areas.

I’m not even going to attempt to clean it – it’s off back tomorrow.

One of my photos from last Saturday’s Zodiac Mindwarp set is in the Wakefield Express this morning (this one I think – I left the copy of the newspaper in the car).

Rock on!

It looks like the Canon Outlet is confined to eBay, and thus subject to nutter price bidding (even using a sniping tool). How tedious.

Anyone got any other ideas please?

So, with not many days to go before holidaytime, right now isn’t the best time for my SLR to go pop.

Jon had it over the weekend for Clarence, and pointed out to me on Sunday that the Sigma 28-200 we use for general gig pics was occasionally having problems focusing and giving ‘error 99’ – general error meaning that a reboot is required, something I last saw using an older reverse-engineered Sigma lens. So naturally I blamed it on the Sigma and he switched to another lens.

I got the 10D back tonight, and since it was sunny popped into the garden to take some photos. All fine on the Canon 75-300 lens for a short space of time then it began failing to autofocus, going from one extreme to the other and back again. If I knocked it into manual focus it was fine – just seemed to be the autofocus (although to be honest it wasn’t making a good effort at working out lighting either, not popping the flash when it needs to). A trawl of the Canon forums suggests that there’s a general ‘issue’ with autofocus not getting quite right on the 10D, but nothing on this scale.

It seems I have a few options:

  1. Get this one fixed, something which won’t happen in time for the holidays and which has an unknown cost element.
  2. Buy a new 30D, something I was loathed to do given that the 40D is strongly rumoured to be coming out in September and that’s what I’ve been waiting for.
  3. Buy a 400D which will have the 10MP stuff and the DIGICiii processor, but which I’m not keen on (I borrowed Col’s last weekend and although it takes nice pics, it doesn’t ‘feel’ right to me, probably because there are less controls – I miss the back dial).
  4. Buy a refurb 10D from the Canon outlet which will probably be less than getting it fixed, and I’ll have it within a few days.
  5. I don’t take a camera on holiday – absolutely unthinkable!

Right now, option 4 is looking favourite, and if I don’t get success on that by mid next week I’ll go into a Jessops and buy a 30D – Nicky can get the 40D when that comes out. I hadn’t exactly budgeted for a 600 quid outlay right now however.

How sodding annoying.

Apple are offering a free trial of Aperture 1.5. Fill out the form and get a serial valid for 30 days. Cor.

Reading over at Fosfor Gadgets about the upcoming Canon EOS 40D, I have to admit I’m more than tempted, even though the sole major upgrade from the 30D seems to be the CCD:

1.6x 10.1M CMOS senor (30D has 1.6x 8.2M CMOS Sensor)
Anti-dust feature
2.5 inch LCD (30D has 2.5 inch LCD)
9 focus points (30D has 9 focus points)
5 fps (30D has 5fps)
Compact flash based memory cards (same as 30D).

There’s links on Slashgear and Gizmodo as well. Maybe time to upgrade the 10D after all!

This is cool, a tutorial on how to build your own Canon shutter release cable. It includes the relevant bits to wire it up to a serial port too so you can automate it. Very cool.

Newer posts