What Jessie Did Next...

...being the inane ramblings of a mundane Yorkshire bird.

Author: Jess (page 18 of 26)

On my way home from my current contract in Sheffield I stopped off at Meadowhell to pick up a spare keyboard from the Apple Store. I’d heard about the new aluminium keyboards being quite thin, and since I tend to carry a full keyboard around with me when I’m contracting this seemed like a good acquisition.

I’ve been using it for about half an hour now to get used to it, and a number of things annoy me – not least the ergonomics. The problem lies in the profile – it’s almost flat to the table, and consequently use of a wrist rest is prohibitive. It also means you have to hold your hands almost vertically over the keyboard itself which (after low use) has given me a bit of an achy wrist; the keys don’t seem to travel enough, sometimes leaving me hitting them probably a bit too hard. Maybe I’ll get used to that.

Second thing that’s naffed me off – merging the volume keys and the function keys. I realist that F16..F19 are probably very important, but it would have been really nice if Apple had kept the volume keys over that way rather than the function key / utility key merging. I have my MacBook Pro configured so that the utility keys are at the foreground, with FN key combinations being required for use of F1..F12 but prefer it the other way round on the keyboard itself. I can’t do that in MacOS, I can either have it all one way or all the other.

It will go in my bag and be used at contracts, but I doubt I’d want to use one of these ‘in anger’ at a workstation. I think I may acquire a couple of the older white Apple keyboards just as spares for when I get a new desktop (which will happen one day or the other when I’m back with a solid office base to work from).

It’s been rumoured for a while, but hosted-application service Zimki is closing at the end of the year (or rather, by the end of 2007).

As a Zimki user I’ve not had an email through about it nor is there any announcement on the front page (I discovered the sign-up notice by accident after I referred Zimki to a friend, I’m not sure how long it’s been there), and the T+C’s don’t state a termination date. Y’never know, it might just be the ‘beta service’ that’s finishing and it’ll go to a full product.

Seems unlikely though.

Update: Another colleague who’s been playing with Zimki has received a ‘service announcement’ email confirming that all existing Zimki data will be deleted on 24th December:

As of 24 December 2007 all applications and data remaining on the Zimki service will be deleted and the servers decommissioned. Users are advised to move their applications along with any associated data before the closure date. There are no plans to opensource Zimki.

What a shame – it wasn’t a bad idea at all. What other alternatives are out there for such hosted services which don’t have a SPoF in the company they’re hosted by?

I’ve recently been evaluating mechanisms of doing bulk uploads through a Web browser, ie. without installing external software. This has involved me taking apart large amounts of other peoples’ code and trying to work out how they’ve done it.

Bulk uploads seem to fall into one of two camps:

  • Java applets: these tend to be largely ugly, slow, and seem hit-and-miss as to whether they will be supported on a user’s browser.
  • Flash applications: these tend to be overthought mashups but seem to work OK.

Both of course require plugins, which is something I’ve resigned myself to after working out that the level of control I require from this project excludes anything Javascript-y and AJAX-y.

Or so I thought. I spent a day this week taking apart three major ‘file sharing’ and ‘file hosting’ website uploaders, and was quite surprised to find that the technique preferred nowadays is a mashup of Flash and AJAX. Now Flash is something I’ve avoided for a long long time but with the release of Adobe Flash CS3 it’s got some nice hooks into Javascript which means you can use Flash’s own bits of file handling and uploading where Javascript simply won’t do. Add some AJAX into that equation and you’ve got quite a nice uploader which, granted it needs Flash, but means that you don’t have to diddle with the UI bits of it. Incidentally, this is how Flickr does it, with a fallback to a basic HTTP upload jobbie.

So why not Java? Well, I used Xcode on the Mac to write a very basic test applet using Swing, and got it working. Then I tested it under XP and Vista, noticing that I got the grey box of uninstalledness. That’s enough for me to want to ditch it.

If you’re still using Flash 8 by the way, there is a Flash/Javascript Integration Kit which doesn’t work under CS3 (but if you’re using Actionscript 3.0 then you should be using the ExternalInterface stuff anyway).

For many years I was a Eudora fan, using it to organise my email from upwards of 20 POP3 boxes. When I moved to IMAP I ended up using Mulberry, and it followed me onto the MacBook. I still have problems with the way Mulberry does some things (such as not rendering HTML mail, inline attachments, or being able to set ‘priority’ on outgoing emails) so it was with interest that I heard the first version of Penelope (aka Eudora 8) had been released, and I installed it eagerly.

Firstly, they’re very eager to state that it’s a complete rewrite, or to be more accurate it’s a hack of Thunderbird. However, I think I’d expected more than this – it did have a nice Eudora-y installer and a lovely set of icons, but other than that it was… well, Thunderbird. It’s also interesting to note that most of the bug reports on the Penelope tracker appear to be to do with keystrokes not doing the right things.

One final note: if you’re going to try this, back up your Thunderbird config first. Penelope very helpfully trampled all over my Thunderbird settings and left my NNTP reader in an almost unusable state.

2/10 – could try harder.

I’ve just spent the morning in Leeds, after turning up at the Commercial Street shop at 10ish with my not-very-good Canon EOS 30D.

The gentleman remembered me from Sunday, so it was reasonably easy just to get started. He brought out another 30D for me and I went outside to take some photos to test it was all OK – sadly not, there were 3 or 4 obvious marks. So another unit was procured, which had the same problem.

Then they’d run out of 30D bodies, so he walked up to the nearest branch on Headrow and picked up their remaining 30D. That had dust on it.

By that time I was getting a bit anxious, but the nice gentleman phoned the Merrion Centre branch which had a sealed one and a display model. The sealed unit also had dust on the CCD, so we tried the display model. That worked! So now I have a 30D which doesn’t have dust on it.

According to the sales guys I spoke to, they’ve had quite a few 400Ds returned with dirty CCDs which just won’t clean, and the current rumour is there’s a bad batch – this seemed to be the first 30D they’d had back but by their own admission they don’t sell many. Bizarrely, my 10D lasted two years before I needed to get the CCD cleaned, and I’m wondering if the CCD in the 30D is susceptible. It also shows that the 400D’s CCD-cleaning feature doesn’t actually seems to be that great.

Irritating, but I’m glad it’s sorted and Jessops were very helpful in rectifying the problem.

I’d noticed on some of the test shots I did on the 30D, that there were a couple of dark patches. Very faint, but there nontheless and if you know what you’re looking for it’s very distracting – a hallmark of dust on the CCD. This isn’t something you should have on a brand new camera.

Now I’ve had my suspicions that this camera I’d bought from Leeds Jessops had been pre-owned (the seal on the box seemed to be taped back up when I bought it but I paid it little mind – lots of companies do that to check contents before selling), but this seems to confirm it. I’ve barely had 1000 pics off it and all of them have the same dusty bit.

For those of you wondering how I checked – whack the aperture right up (f28 in this case), point it at a blue sky and take a pic. The uniform colour shows the problem areas.

I’m not even going to attempt to clean it – it’s off back tomorrow.

Simon Wardley, COO of Zimki has resigned, during his speech at OSCOM, with the quote:

Open source is not a tactic. It is not a strategy. It is the only practical way of competing in this marketplace.

I’ve just heard a couple of rumours that the entire staff have been laid off too, with a potential platform closedown imminent. Nothing on the Zimki blog yet, but I wouldn’t expect there to be – plenty to be found via Google Blogsearch though, and Simon’s own blog posting on the subject is here.

There’s a Reg story about it as well.

Right, I’ve kept shut about the new Trek movie coming in 2008, but yesterday’s Comic-Con revealed:

  • Heroes star Zachary Quinto will play a young Spock, and Len Nimoy has been confirmed that he’ll reprise his role as an older version of the same character (pic side-by-side). This says to me ‘flashbacks’. Or (and I really hope I’m wrong) time travel.
  • Kirk hasn’t been cast. Abrams has confirmed he’d like to get Shatner in but they won’t “shoehorn” him if it doesn’t feel right.
  • There’s a new teaser poster – doesn’t reveal anything but is on the front page of startrek.com with the US release date of Christmas Day 2008.

No other real confirmations – we were expecting something a bit better I think, but hey.

I’m still trying to work out if the art department at the Beeb have touched up Quinto’s eyebrows on this article 🙂

One of my photos from last Saturday’s Zodiac Mindwarp set is in the Wakefield Express this morning (this one I think – I left the copy of the newspaper in the car).

Rock on!

It looks like the Canon Outlet is confined to eBay, and thus subject to nutter price bidding (even using a sniping tool). How tedious.

Anyone got any other ideas please?

So, with not many days to go before holidaytime, right now isn’t the best time for my SLR to go pop.

Jon had it over the weekend for Clarence, and pointed out to me on Sunday that the Sigma 28-200 we use for general gig pics was occasionally having problems focusing and giving ‘error 99’ – general error meaning that a reboot is required, something I last saw using an older reverse-engineered Sigma lens. So naturally I blamed it on the Sigma and he switched to another lens.

I got the 10D back tonight, and since it was sunny popped into the garden to take some photos. All fine on the Canon 75-300 lens for a short space of time then it began failing to autofocus, going from one extreme to the other and back again. If I knocked it into manual focus it was fine – just seemed to be the autofocus (although to be honest it wasn’t making a good effort at working out lighting either, not popping the flash when it needs to). A trawl of the Canon forums suggests that there’s a general ‘issue’ with autofocus not getting quite right on the 10D, but nothing on this scale.

It seems I have a few options:

  1. Get this one fixed, something which won’t happen in time for the holidays and which has an unknown cost element.
  2. Buy a new 30D, something I was loathed to do given that the 40D is strongly rumoured to be coming out in September and that’s what I’ve been waiting for.
  3. Buy a 400D which will have the 10MP stuff and the DIGICiii processor, but which I’m not keen on (I borrowed Col’s last weekend and although it takes nice pics, it doesn’t ‘feel’ right to me, probably because there are less controls – I miss the back dial).
  4. Buy a refurb 10D from the Canon outlet which will probably be less than getting it fixed, and I’ll have it within a few days.
  5. I don’t take a camera on holiday – absolutely unthinkable!

Right now, option 4 is looking favourite, and if I don’t get success on that by mid next week I’ll go into a Jessops and buy a 30D – Nicky can get the 40D when that comes out. I hadn’t exactly budgeted for a 600 quid outlay right now however.

How sodding annoying.

I just got a text from Jon who’s down at Clarence Park taking pics of the Music Collective setting up the festival:

“11:10 and the bandstand doors are finally open. They’re fucked and the council had nailed them shut…”

The sheer mentality of Wakefield District Council escapes us all, I feel.

It’s been quite a while since we last visited Wolski’s: it was my favourite eatery in Wakefield for a while, but went through quite a bad phase with the lunchtime ‘buffet’ being little more than left-over slops and the evening meals having so much sea-salt as to be almost inedible. However, that was a couple of years ago so last night myself and Nicky went to see what they were like now.

The first impression seems to be that it’s quiet. We turned up at 8:30pm, and had a bit of a battle getting through the front door with two smokers blocking our way and reluctant to shift to one side (we later discovered that they either worked there, or were friends with a waitress). Once inside, we ordered a gin and tonic each and browsed what was on offer.

The menu hasn’t changed much – they offer a range of nice dishes such as lobster, New Zealand mussels, and various cuts of ostrich, alongside the usual 70s-style cuisine of prawn cocktail, etc. I went for a starter of chicken liver pate followed by lobster in cream and garlic, whereas Nicky ordered duck spring rolls followed by rib-eye steak.

Once shown to the table the starters arrived, and they were very good – there was a lot of pate and not much bread to balance it out with but I understand the economies of scale in these things. A substantial amount of foliage accompanied, and I left a lot of it with the thought that if I ate it all I wouldn’t have enough room for a main course. Nicky’s duck spring rolls were stuffed full of meat – very substantial, and according to her very tasty. Good start so far.

At that point it occurred that we had no drinks, and it took a few attempts to order a bottle of wine (I must admit, if I’d forgotten to serve wine when I worked as a waiter back in the early 90s I’d have probably been disciplined!).

The main course arrived and I had feared the worst – yes the lobster was smothered in way too much sauce again, drowning out the delicate flavour of the lobster (which at least had been dressed properly). Judicious use of a knife to scrape away large dollops yielded a reasonably cleaner dish, and again piles of seasoned salad had been provided to pad the meal out. Nicky’s steak was chewy, and the large jenga chips were a bit crozzled, but otherwise OK.

For dessert I tried a raspberry creme brulee – way too heavy, and the vanilla cookie with it was surplus to requirements owing to the sheer stodge. Nicky tried a toffee crumble which was largely a pile of sweet sludge. Low points on the pudding, chaps.

In general, it’s got better – maybe they’re good at larger parties of fixed menus, just not a la carte offerings for a quite meal for two. Perhaps we just caught them on a bad night, or something – the waiting staff weren’t very attentive, and I still object to having a mandatory 10% ‘gratuity’ adding on to a bill (I’d probably have left that anyway if the service was reasonable but gratuity does not mean mandatory in my book).

Two of us on a three-courser including a bottle of wine and two G+Ts came to just short of £70 – still a bit overpriced for what it was, but it’s showing upward signs in what was once Wakefield’s premier restaurant.

Peter Tuddenham has died, the voice of Blake’s 7 computers ‘Orac‘, ‘Zen’ and ‘Slave’. He’d had a good innings – he was 88 after all, but will still be sorely missed.

Myself and Matt met him at a London Comic Con a few years back, and he was a really nice bloke.

It’s just over 8 months since my IBM T42p went properly titsup for the final time. This week, I finally received a refund on the purchase price (which, er, would have been without a hitch except for it being refunded to the original credit card used to buy it which actually belongs to my stepfather). Thus the case is closed thanks to the efforts of Tomas at Lenovo, whose predecessor got in touch with me after seeing a blog post on the subject.

Some statistics:

  • The T42p had a total of 15 trouble-tickets logged against it, stretching from broken hard disk to bad display to busted motherboard.
  • The average time-to-fix went from 4 days the first time (owned by IBM), to 8 months the final time (owned by Lenovo).
  • The mean time between failures decreased substantially once the Lenovo purchase had gone through.
  • Average time waiting on a phone line just to be given a ticket number was 45 minutes.

My experience may not be typical – however, in the course of the whole debacle I have been in touch with many, many IBM owners who have had the same sort of trouble. I only hope that they have an eventual result also.

Epilogue: We have used the refund to purchase Nicky a MacBook Pro, and still had change left over to help pay for our holiday this year. IBM are still selling the T60 at a premium, and in this case the Mac is cheaper and more reliable. Go figure.

Older posts Newer posts